SQYX Notes Outline Regarding LSBC Contempt Complaint

DEC 2ND    SINCE TIME BEGAN    2015 ADE

PRELIMINARY DISCLOSURE INSTRUCTIONS TO GOODWIN GENERAL LEGAL COUNSEL OF CHOICE

NOTES OUTLINE
Goodwin Responses Through Legal Counsel; Including, Voir Dire Issues

PARAMOUNTCY LAND TITLE DISPUTE IN THE ABSENCE OF TREATY

SECTION ONE : LSBC COMPLAINT OF CRIMINAL CONTEMPT

Foundation Of Jurisdiction Of EIIR Canada SCBC To Form Court

 (A) CSSP versus EIIR Canada : Customary Laws & International Laws : Paramountcy Governing Authority : Breaches Therein; including, but not limited to Respondent Goodwin's Allegations Upon EIIR Canada LSBC & SCBC of historical and modern era commissions of cultural genocide upon CSSP; including, legal counsels acting for Indian Residential And Day School victim survivors; as preserved in catalogue by the the Canada Truth And Reconciliation Commission (CTRC); including, this CTRC 2015 Final Report. Note Synopsis to EIIR Canada 2015

SECTION TWO : GOODWIN LEGAL COUNSEL APPLICATIONS

Elizabeth II Binding Duties Of Care Entrenched Within Coronation Oath

(A) Coronation Oath Guarantees State Funded Competent Legal Counsel Of Choice  (CLCC) To CSSP, Including, Respondent Goodwin, et al

(B) 2005 Letters and Electronic Exchanges Regarding Legal Counsel Per Binding Terms & Conditions Of EIIR Coronation Oath

(C) Impact Of EIIR Breach Of Coronation Oath

1. Historical public domain UK publications (Fitzgertald : HBC null and void Charter) (Baldwin : HBC Charter) (Oath Breach : Letters From An Englishman)

(D) Goodwin 2013 and 2015 Legal Counsel State Nation Funding

1. 2005 Mandamus Petition Upon Elizabeth II; including
2. Airey versus Ireland EUCHR Case Decision in favour of Airey; requiring, Ireland to provide adequate state funded competent legal counsel of choice for Airey in a domestic dispute : Legal Aid
3. November 2015 Goodwin submitted CLCC Mandamus Petition upon EIIR Canada; noting imminent December Criminal Contempt SCBC LSBC v Goodwin Trial

(E) UN Charter And Chapter VII Breaches Constitute UNSC Just And Good Cause To Exercise Sanctions Against EIIR At United Kingdom And Canada Regarding Hostile Military Occupancy; including the 2005 Goodwin Mandamus Petition stipulations of events to unfold in the event that EIIR defaults and breaches Coronation Oath obligations; namely, that the UNSC will exercise jurisdiction at EIIR UK under UN Charter, Chapter VII provisions; and, therein, seize the EIIR Crown Jewels treasury into UNSC Trust; through which the UNSC shall administrate the mandamus provisions of the 2015 in the event of EIIR default in favour of the Goodwin 2005 Mandamus Petition provisions for legal counsel

SECTION THREE : JURISDICTION OF COURT

Non-Ceded Traditional CSSP Territories Occupied By Hostile Force

SECTION FOUR : GOODWIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

Free Prior Informed Consent : Universal Civil, Political, Human Rights

SECTION FIVE : GOODWIN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINTS

Substantive Responses To Be Submitted Through Chosen Legal Counsel

Budget $40 Million CDN : Time Lapse 20-30 Years

General Legal Counsel

1. Management of Legal Counsel Team (A) UK; (B) Canada; (C) UN Security Counsel; (D) European Union Court of Human Rights; (E) Inter-American Commission On Human Rights; (F) UN Credentials Committee; (G) UN Human Rights Commission; (H) International Criminal Court; (I) International Court of Justice; (J) Original Indigenous Peoples Court

Competent Legal Counsel(s) of Choice : Priorization of legal pursuits:

1. Establish mandatory EIIR Canada state funded adequate competent legal counsel of choice for Goodwin
2.  
3. Lodge Preliminary disclosure complaint to ICC / International Criminal Court via Office of the Prosecutor for purposes of establishing accounts of cultural genocide in regards to the constitutional monarchy of Canada; and, in particular, complaints as originating from Indian Residential and Day School Victim survivors; and, as continued in the evident LSBC / SCBC campaign against Goodwin regarding absence of land treaty providing governance authority to EIIR Canada; noting the evident perversion of allegations against Goodwin; and, in particular, the evident bias of Judge Greyell as set in the SCBC decision at LSBC 2014 Case S67804 against Goodwin. wherein Judge Greyell apparently ignored the balance of probabilities in favour of Goodwin's allegations of being adopted by Kwa'mutsun Nation hereditary chief HRH Stitumaatulwut Hwuneem; and, instead, coloured Goodwin as some rag-tag Freeman of the Land, as deliberated by Judge Rooke in the Meads versus Meads case